• Why Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic essays?

    • May students use Wikipedia as a reliable source for essay writing?

      Posted on October 7, 2017 with 1 comment

      All professors and tutors pay great attention to the sources, chosen by their students for producing academic essay. They inform that all sources should be academic and reliable and sometimes it is additionally mentioned that Wikipedia is not considered to be a suitable source for academic essays. It is not simply because we can not trust those people, who write content for Wikipedia, but also because this is a unique encyclopedia, presenting information from consensus. To the same extent like Facebook allows users post any information about themselves, they like, and it is not checked or restricted by anybody, Wikipedia allowed individuals create their own portions of knowledge. Thus Wikipedia could be considered a kind of social channel and is correspondingly much distanced from academic writing. Each student has the similar aim – to develop his knowledge and be able to grow as a researcher. According to the rules of academic writing, students are to look for primary and secondary sources in order to acquire information. Wikipedia provides general information, summed up for general audience. Actually any encyclopedia is not a good academic source due to generalized presentation of facts and leaving little to no space for making judgments and conclusions. Writing a paper, each student should struggle to become an expert in his theme, able to analyze the facts and develop new ideas about the materials. Taking all this into consideration, it is evident that the major reason, why Wikipedia is not used for academic essays, is not lack of trust or because information there could be changed. The real reason of this is the generalization of information, which is a usual approach for any encyclopedia and thus encyclopedias, including Wikipedia, are all not the best sources for any academic research and writing.


      Custom writing serivce essaywritingdata.com
  • Developmental Psychology Viewpoint

    • Will science ever convince parents to stop spanking their children?

      Posted on June 30, 2011 with 4 comments

      Full disclaimer: I don't spank my children. We're a gentle-discipline kind of household (most of the time, anyway), and I think the bulk of the evidence from decades of parenting research supports that decision. So when the issue of spanking comes up in conversation with other parents, I've never hesitated to repeat my spanking-is-bad mantra:  Spanking sometimes works in the short-term, but not the long run, and children who are spanked are more likely to experience a long list of negative outcomes like depression, aggression, and other antisocial behaviors. As far as I'm concerned, this isn't up for debate. Around here, we like science, and this is what the science tell us so far. And yes--of course there are exceptions. Not all children who are spanked experience the same outcomes.  I get that, I really do. But many studies, of many thousands of children or grown children, tell the story. And yet there are big holes in what we know, and I suspect that these holes are what make some parents so difficult to convince.  Sure, we know that some children are spanked or slapped for misbehaving, and that these children are at greater risk for certain outcomes. But what does this...

      Continue reading this entry →
  • Recent Posts